Search

 

Stadiums and Shrines with Sutton

|stadiumsandshrines.com|

R.E.M. @ The Hollywood Bowl: Setting > Setlist

This entry might have been longer if we had made it in time for The National. I have a bone to pick with The Hollywood Bowl 6:30 start times, but this isn’t that kind of blog (or maybe it will be by the time I’m done).

So there comes a point in the traffic where you accept it, you will not be seeing the opener tonight. Fitting then that the lyrics, “Alright, already, we’ll all ‘Float On’” greeted us at the gates. Modest Mouse was half way through. Jessie and I did what any LA type does at these shows: got a bottle of wine and sushi from the concession stand.  A nice mild night set in and with all necessary steps taken, we could finally sit back and take in the real star of the evening: the venue.

Really though, It’s R.E.M.; a band that practically started alternative music. They’ve handled success and fame with grace; it doesn’t surprise me that Radiohead credits them for so much. Here’s an act that remains “cool” over 25 years since breaking out.

Spin’s Charles Aaron once said, “"They've shown how far an underground, punk-inspired rock band could go within the industry without whoring out its artistic integrity in any obvious way. They'd figured out how to buy in, not sellout-in other words, they've achieved the American Bohemian Dream."

Who can’t appreciate that?

I wasn’t even going to fake being more acquainted with their 14-album catalog than your average member of the MTV generation. But I rarely felt like an outsider on Thursday, mostly because I think everyone kind of felt like an outsider.  9 of the 25 songs played were from the new album, and the rest spanned not so much the “hits” but more the stages of the band. There were a few sing-along moments. And a few times where I looked around in awe of how meaningful certain songs were to people. But other parts were spent literally talking. Like conversing in the middle of songs. I hate the guy that does that. And I was he.

It sounded like R.E.M. in a box. It just wasn’t loud enough. I’ve heard some pretty harsh feedback on the set list and I don’t need to join in. But give the people what they want; this is an expensive night after all.

Michael Stipe was sharp, even if he kept saying how worried he was about this being their 3rd show of the tour and all. Hopefully they will make tweaks to the remainder of it. And I enjoyed every time he rambled in between songs. I simply like Michael Stipe.

The Bowl proves that people can actually enjoy live rock music while remaining seated. At least “Losing My Religion” got everyone standing. And “Man on the Moon” was nice way to close. I’ll say it again though; the draw here is an amphitheater in the hills.

One real complaint: whoever was working the big screen camera controls was useless. I personally would have liked to hear “Nightswimming” and “Strange Currencies”, but 110 minutes can only hold so much legend.

Published Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:35 PM by Sutton

Comments

No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled

About Sutton

"This is a friendly music blog from 'that dude that always gets too excited about music and needs tell you about it.' From festival recaps to album hype, he coats it all with your average pop culture-junkie appeal. He's an enthusiast (not an insider) offering a resource for anything buzzworthy." I grew up in NH, did college in Boston, and am having anxiety attacks/sunshine/and professional life in California. Every moment in the journey can be pinpointed and timelined by the particular music I was into at the time. Everyone has a life soundtrack. I talk about mine endlessly. The Objective: At an important crossroads in my blogging here. Is it dangerous to ask for so much from music? Is it healthy to evoke personal ties with the creations of artists who don't know us and perhaps have no intention of us reading into their art in the fashion we do? I would argue that it's not dangerous or wrong, but this is where I must be clear; these are not my discoveries nor would I ever write in a way to claim ownership for them. For example, if a band is the catalyst for "the finest moment in my own collegiate musical exploration/explosion", than that does not make them my band or make me any more informed anyone else. My hope for this outlet is not to present myself as an overwhelming snapshot of indie crap that you look at and say "hmm, he's really into that", but rather the idea is to spread the word, the love, the information, the music!; the overall feeling you get when you declare "i like this band" in other words, i'd love to be a resource in your own explosion time-line. and if we are surfing the same wave of taste, then I welcome discussion and new leads into what you think we could dig together.

This Blog

Syndication

Archives

June 2008 (2)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (7)
March 2008 (3)
February 2008 (3)
January 2008 (4)
December 2007 (5)
November 2007 (7)
October 2007 (7)
September 2007 (7)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (3)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (4)
April 2007 (8)
March 2007 (6)
February 2007 (2)